A Feeding Revolution?

David E. Boruchowitz


Article originally published in Tropical Fish Hobbyist Magazine, January 2003. Pages 114-118. Original Article Download (PDF)

Full Article Text:

(Photos, data, and information courtesy of Pablo Tepoot, New Life International, Inc.,

For this last technology we're highlighting this month, we feel the need to begin with some disclaimers. First, we repeat that we are not endorsing New Life Spectrum foods as better than any other foods. We are not even saying that  the claims made by these products are true. The whole reason we're bringing this information to our readers is that  we find the philosophy behind the formulation of this food intriguing, and we feel that its endorsement by so many  prominent aquarists warrants a close look at it. Many of the standard guidelines for feeding aquarium fish are  trampled by New Life foods, which indicates that there might just be a revolution in the wings here. We expect that,  as with any technological revolution-undergravel filtration and the science of biofiltration being a perfect example,  the extent and ramifications of the changes will be varied and widespread, and that controversy will hound this  technology forever. Who could have predicted wet-dry filters or live rock filtration from the humble little plastic-tube  filters that started it all? Likewise, who knows what effect, if any, the arrival of this new type of food will have? All  we're sure of is that it'.s interesting, and it'.s only likely to get even more so.

Fat and healthy, these long-term captive Moorish Idols are feeding eagerly on the pelleted food.


Pablo Tepoot of New Life International has been quietly brewing a tempest in the sea of tropical fish foods for a while now. Some aquarists hail New Life Spectrum food as the greatest thing in the hobby since silicate glass. Some people see Pablo's product as just another fish food, and his claims as unsubstantiated. Rather than get caught in this controversy, let's concentrate on the food itself and take a look at what's different about its formulation.

The first thing that attracted my attention to this food was the claim that it was something different. Always eager for news to pass on to our readers, I began talking to Pablo when he approached me at a tradeshow. As I listened and looked at his videos and other evidence, I realized  that while TFH could not do the  exhaustive testing necessary to see  exactly how revolutionary this  product was, our readers could. Then  when we got the idea to highlight  some new and potentially very  significant technologies in the January  2003 issue, it was obvious we should  include this one.  

It's in There

The first thing you'll notice about  this food is that it belies the traditional  advice to feed a varied diet. This food  is supposed to be fed exclusively. The  reason to stress a diet of lots of  different foods is that nutrients  missing from one food will be found in  another. Most fish eat a variety of food  items in the wild, which leads to the  conclusion that it's best to feed a  variety of food items in the aquarium.  The idea that led to the production of  Spectrum foods, however, was to  research the nutrient needs of fish and  then formulate a food that contained  them all. Perhaps easier said than  done, this overkill approach is one  logical solution to the problem of  feeding tropical fish in captivity.  Traditional wisdom, of course, bristles  at this. One food for all fish? One  formulation for marine and fresh?  Herbivore and carnivore? Grazer and  predator? How is that possible? Mention a nutritional need, and Pablo says, "It's in  there." Mention another, and he says,  "It's in there." Mention a nutrient needed  for full color production, "It's in there." A  nutrient whose absence is implicated in  disease, "It's in there." A trace mineral,  "It's in there." A food that increases  vitality, "It's in there." Seaweed that's vital  to tang nutrition, "It's in there." A food  that stimulates spawning, "It's in there." A nutrient that boost immune response,  "Its in there."

His overkill approach is readily  exemplified by his Thera-A  formulation, recommended for fish  infected with parasites. This is not a  medicated food, but one rich in the  benefits of garlic. The amount of garlic  included was based on research into  clinical tests of garlic as a parasite  control; Pablo did not include the  amount determined to be necessary but  instead used significantly more. Since  garlic is a food, not a drug, this overki.11  philosophy runs little risk other than  leaving the fish in need of a breath  freshener. The pungence of the  container when you open it testifies to  the strength of the product!  

Left: In this closeup you can see that the fish is not at all emaciated.
Below: A wide variety of species feeding eagerly on New Life Spectrum food.


Natural Color

New Spectrum's all-in-one approach  does not mean a list of artificial  ingredients. The idea instead is to  combine exactly all those things that  fish are eating in the wild. A special  emphasis is placed on the absolute  avoidance of hormones. After all,  hormones can bring out colors on a  female guppy, but they'll render her  sterile, too! Aquarists have known for a  long time that a fish's coloration  (especially red pigments) can be very  dependent on nutritional factors, since  much of a fish's color comes from color  components ingested by the fish. For  example, feeding shrimp and kri.11 to  enhance yellows and reds is a timehonored  practice in the hobby.

 

Single Diet?

But what about fish eating just one  food? No matter how nutritious it is,  don't the fish need something else?  And, no matter how good it tastes, don't  they need the spice of variety? 

We all know how fussy certain fish  are about what they will deign to eat,  while others are regular gluttons. Some  species are so specific in their choice of  food that they literally starve to death in  captivity One notorious example of this  is the Moorish idol (Zanclus spp.).  Pablo, however, has some Moorish  idols that feed frenziedly on his food.  Despite the fact that they have been fed  nothing else for more than a year, they  act toward the food the way most fish  only behave when fed live foods. It  appears the stuff really tastes good.

Typically idols are emaciated when  you see them in an aquarium, but  Pablo's fish are ... well,fat! In fact, he has  photos and videos of specimens of  several species noted for their inability  to survive in captivity that are plump,  sassy, and chowing down on his food  like little piglets.

 

If They Eat It, They'll Live

Moorish idols aren't the only hard-or impossible-  to-keep fish that Pablo has  maintained long term. His loyal  customers expand the list of species  even further. He is fond of saying, "If  they eat it, they'll live," meaning that  if a fish can be induced to take the  prepared food, the food will sustain the  animal in good health and color for a  prolonged period of time. It would be  interesting to see this claim tested in  some other really difficult cases.  

A study comparing different fish foods found quite a difference. These fish were randomly assigned to the experimental groups and have both been in the study for 20 weeks. The upper fish was fed New Life Spectrum, while the lower fish received a color flake food.


Possible Benefits

That idea makes me think of ways in  which this product might be tested to  the limit. There are fish like mandarins  that never thrive, even when they can  be trained to accept various foods. As  of now, cleaner wrasses Labroides  dimidiatus are simply not suitable for  aquarium life; mandarins (Synchiropus,  Pterosynchiropus) are suitable only for  very large, very established reef setups;  and seahorses (Hippocampus spp.) are  iffy in most cases. There would be a  true revolution in the marine hobby if  1) these fish could be trained to take  this food and 2) they actually thrived  on it the way other species do when  they eat it. 

That, however, is wishful thinking,  and perhaps unattainable. Nevertheless,  it is clear that there are cases in which  this food may be a resource in turning  heretofore off-limits fish into animals  that the average aquarist can keep. In fact, there is an inherent challenge to  all fish food manufacturers in thisresearch  into the cues which elicit  feeding in wild-caught marines might  suggest ways in which prepared food,  which is already nutritionally adequate,  can be made acceptable to hard-to-feed  specimens. After all, no matter how  miraculously nutritious a food is, if a  particular fish won't eat it, it's of no  value in keeping that fish.  

 Two More Considerations

The adage suggests putting money  behind mouthing off, and Spectrum  foods come with an impressive moneyback  guarantee. Such a warranty  obviously takes a lot of the risk out of  trying a product.  In addition, the testimonials that  these products have garnered are  not just from Joe and Jane Aquarist,  but also from some of the top names  in the trade-renowned hobbyists,  accomplished breeders, and respected  wholesalers. Many are people I know  and respect personally, and whose  word alone makes me stop and  consider carefully  

 

Potential Drawbacks

I wouldn't be honest if I didn't admit  to reservations about this obviously  beneficial food-a couple, in fact. First  is a worry about the suitability of this  food as an exclusive diet, though I am  amazed by the actual videos I've seen of  fish in such a regimen. The second is  related and is based on the biological  difference between herbivores and  carnivores in terms of the shape and  structure of the digestive tract.  Even with all the necessary nutrients  present, nutrients which are normally  ingested in vastly different proportions  are known to cause problems-for  example, the presence of too much  high-protein meat in the diet of  algivorous cichlids. I am enough of a  scientist, however, to realize that much  scientific wisdom today began as the  heresies of another time. Faced with  evidence suggesting I may need to  alter my perceptions, I am willing topursue the matter. I feel that there is enough evidence to warrant further

investigation, tempered with caution. After all, the proof is ultimately in the pudding.

 

The Reader's Role

That's where you come in. Even if  tropical fish nutrition were the kind of  research topic that engendered  copious grant monies, there aren't  enough laboratories to carry out all  the necessary testing. On the other  hand, there are an awful lot of  aquarists out there, and the combined  and cumulative knowledge hobbyists  can acquire has the necessary scope to  evaluate products like Spectrum fish  food. The fact that many aquarists  already swear by their favorite foods  may actually be a benefit. Such things  complicate the data, but they make for  much more interesting evaluations.

Top Left: This is a photo of a Lamprologus leleupi after 20 weeks on New Life food;
Top Right: This is a Lamprologus leleupi after 18 weeks on New Life food;
Bottom Left: This fish was 20 weeks with a third prepared food;
Bottom Right: This leleupi is shown after 20 weeks on yet a fourth brand of food.


I guarantee that even if every single  aquarist tried this food, and if every  one of them found it to perform as  claimed, that there would still be  people who would decide not to use  it. There isn't a person, place, or thing  in this world that can please all people  equally. Many aquarists, however,  might find this product useful in some  form or another, in some application  or another. As always when we bring  product news to our readership, we  encourage both experimentation and  documentation-let us know your  results, and we'll pass along any major  news that may modify our position at  this time and place. And if you're a  manufacturer with documentation to  suggest that you have a product that  defies current wisdom and/or has the  potential to effect a major change in  the aquarium hobby, well, I'm as close  as editor@tfh.com.


Note: The caption photo reference tags have been edited to reflect the photo placements in this repost of the article due to differences in layout formatting for the website.


Article originally published in Tropical Fish Hobbyist Magazine, January 2003. Pages 114-118